April 21, 2014

(Source: rodeo.net, via afatfox)

April 21, 2014

miskeena:

u evr stay up at night thinking bout how capitalism is ruining your life

(Source: qawiya, via alexwaepenwifebunny)

April 21, 2014
okjanelle:

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #193, 1989

okjanelle:

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #193, 1989

(via divinedorothy)

April 21, 2014

nentindo:

kidshade:

ediebrit:

IM FUCKING SCREAMING

IM IN FUCKING STITCHES 

the only thing funnier than this video are the comments on it

(via scrlett)

April 21, 2014

(Source: melgibsonsdickandballs, via theevilstan)

April 21, 2014

toskamoebae:

I’ve never met a sad gay. Maybe it’s because they choose to be gay against all odds. And isn’t that a purpose, to be happy.

Girl, what? Gay guys aren’t sad? I’ve known gay guys who were depressed, anxious, and struggled with mental illness. Are you thinking of the caricature of the peppy, sassy gay best friend? Cause that’s a stereotype, that’s not at all reflective of reality.

Also, people don’t choose to be gay, so whaa?

April 21, 2014

cyanine:

My sexual orientation is girls who look like they could beat me up and boys who look like they wouldn’t stand a chance

dang, this post exploded. seeing so many people like and reblog it kind of validates my sexuality in a weird way. It makes me happy :)

(via projectkagerou)

April 21, 2014

(Source: v2o, via radical-hour)

April 20, 2014

overlypolitebisexual:

that bastille cover of blue jeans (“requiem for blue jeans”) is so tragic they’ve literally changed the lyrics to shit like “i made your eyes burn” and “i was like james dean” just so they don’t sound gay but somehow it sounds even gayer than if they hadn’t changed anything

Hmm that’s true, I wasn’t impressed with the pronoun changes either

April 20, 2014
itstimeforfeminism:

calendar—girl:

girlsgetbusyzine:

writeswrongs:

cumaeansibyl:

coffeeandconlangs:

Unnecessary “fillers” in our speech. I’d rather have “like” than up-talking, though (if we had to choose one, that is). Ewwww, up-talking. Then again, a combination of the two would render me homicidal maniac.


Like, did you ever notice? That, like, the speech patterns people, like, think are stupid?  Are, like, commonly associated with, like, women?
And, like, there’s this thing? Where, like, women aren’t supposed to be, like, assertive? So they, like, qualify their speech? Because, like, we’re not supposed to, like, stand by our opinions?

1) humiliate women so they don’t feel qualified to speak authoritatively about anything
2) humiliate women for speaking in such a way that reflects how you treat her
3) laugh, you are superior because you don’t use words like “like.”  It isn’t as if being a huge stupid asshole has ever made you worse than a woman who speaks with verbal tics.  

The nail. It is hit on the head.

itstimeforfeminism:

calendar—girl:

girlsgetbusyzine:

writeswrongs:

cumaeansibyl:

coffeeandconlangs:

Unnecessary “fillers” in our speech. I’d rather have “like” than up-talking, though (if we had to choose one, that is). Ewwww, up-talking. Then again, a combination of the two would render me homicidal maniac.

Like, did you ever notice? That, like, the speech patterns people, like, think are stupid?  Are, like, commonly associated with, like, women?

And, like, there’s this thing? Where, like, women aren’t supposed to be, like, assertive? So they, like, qualify their speech? Because, like, we’re not supposed to, like, stand by our opinions?

1) humiliate women so they don’t feel qualified to speak authoritatively about anything

2) humiliate women for speaking in such a way that reflects how you treat her

3) laugh, you are superior because you don’t use words like “like.”  It isn’t as if being a huge stupid asshole has ever made you worse than a woman who speaks with verbal tics.  

The nail. It is hit on the head.

(via brokendildo)